Comey had no authority to charge Clinton or exonerate Clinton.
He was supposed to report to the DOJ what FACTS they uncovered.
But the DOJ was compromised by the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting.
So, Comey took it upon himself to be investigator and prosecutor even though nobody asked him to do so.
A person of integrity would have made a referral....like to the Southern District of New York, where the server was located.
That is what they did to Trump. But Clinton was given special treatment.
One set of rules for thee, another set for me.....socialism.
However, the basic premise of the article (and title) is dead wrong: Clinton can NEVER provide ANY evidence of ANY KIND in any way that shows she is innocent. It isn’t that Comey decided on her innocence by “not having evidence that would prove her innocence” but by deciding on her innocence BEFORE even beginning the “investigation”!
SHE IS GUILTY of buying and deliberately setting her email and her private server network and her private network circuit of strictly democrat operatives and lawyers and government officials SPECIFICALLY to avoid records that would show her bribery, her associations in governments and businesses overseas, and her sales of government information, plans, position papers and policies to the highest bidders.