“GOA’s attorney countered by telling the judge there is no actual proof of one recorded instance where bump stocks have been used in a crime.
Olson even cited the lack of FBI and ATF statements, studies or reports to demonstrate that there is no conclusive evidence that a bump stock was actually used by the Las Vegas shooter.
This was something of a “mic drop” moment, because when given the chance to respond, the government’s lawyer could not — in fact, he refused to — counter Olson’s statement on this point.
Thus, the oral arguments in the Western district federal court on March 6 established unrebutted testimony that, to date, there is no proof of any documented case where a bump stock was used in a crime.”
https://gunowners.org/alert3719/
bump
I assume that bump stocks were used in the Vegas shooting, as was reported by the #FakeNews media, but whether they were or not is irrelevant. The clear letter of the law should decide, and the law does not regulate bump stocks. To anyone sensible, that should settle the question. [Note: I prefer to hit on every shot and think bump stocks are a silly waste of ammo, but my view should be irrelevant to those who like to rock and roll making noise.]
Mic drop moments! I like that. Want to help “crowdfund” the 2nd Amendment? This website can help: https://gundynamics.com/about
Nice touch. This all came about because of the Presidents response to Vegas. Which had NOTHING to do with bumpstocks. The GOA attorney’s damn well know they are lying.