Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge could revoke Roger Stone's bail because his new book is STILL on sale (tr)
Daily Mail ^ | 5 March 2019 | David Martosko

Posted on 03/05/2019 6:45:33 PM PST by Magnatron

The federal judge overseeing former Trump adviser Roger Stone's criminal trial signaled Tuesday that she might revoke his bail, criticizing him and his lawyers for failing to tell her when she issued a gag order that his latest book – which includes slashing commentary about Special Counsel Robert Mueller – was already on sale.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson also wrote in a signed order that she believes Stone's lawyers misled her last week about the timing of the book's release as a means to generate publicity for it.

And regardless of when the book first went on sale, she wrote Tuesday, Stone 'may no longer share his views on these particular subjects with the world.'

Jackson ruled on February 21 that Stone would be permitted to raise money for his defense, and to proclaim his innocence, but otherwise forbade him from making any public comments about his trial or the special counsel probe that led to his criminal charges of lying to investigators, witness tampering and obstruction of justice.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller wrote Jackson on Monday to alert her that a new introduction Stone wrote to accompany his book, titled 'The Myth of Russia Collusion,' was available to the public on Amazon com.

In it, Stone complains that 'Mr. Mueller may frame me for some bogus charge in order to silence me or induce me to testify against the president.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amybermanjackson; jamescomey; lisapage; peterstrzok; robertmueller; rogerstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
This is getting ridiculous. This woman is WAY off the reservation Constitutionally. This entire gag order needs to be argued all the way to the Supreme Court.

And then she should be impeached...

1 posted on 03/05/2019 6:45:33 PM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Magnatron
And regardless of when the book first went on sale, she wrote Tuesday, Stone 'may no longer share his views on these particular subjects with the world.'

Just wow...

2 posted on 03/05/2019 6:47:22 PM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

This broad knows a she went too far with Manafort.


3 posted on 03/05/2019 6:47:23 PM PST by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Go Aftervthe publisher next?


4 posted on 03/05/2019 6:48:21 PM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Also, pretrial publicity influencing a trial has historically been a tactic courts have been trying to prevent for the prosecution.

The defendant has always been much more free to talk about their own case. Are they worried Stone would appeal later and argue that HE himself created an unfair environment in his own case?

This psycho judge is way out of line and needs her leash yanked hard.

Stone has written many books, this is right in with the topics he writes about. This is pure first amendment.


5 posted on 03/05/2019 6:51:25 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

Then she will require a complete list of everyone that bought the book so they can be eliminated from potential jurors, anyone that has access to InfoWars, anyone that watched a Infowars Youtube video, on and on...

Proglibs have lost their minds.

.


6 posted on 03/05/2019 6:52:30 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
This broad knows a she went too far with Manafort.

How so? She has not broken stride as far as I can tell. She is a very biased liberal hack, which is why all mueller's cases go before her. The courts are packed with biased liberal judges who could care less what the laws or constitution says.
7 posted on 03/05/2019 6:52:53 PM PST by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Is Stone’s Publisher going to be ordered by the Judge to Recall all the Books that were already sold too?

The so called Judge is out of her F’n mind.


8 posted on 03/05/2019 6:54:06 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

So: because I’m a Leftist hack, judge, I have the power to control every aspect of a person’s life, up to and including their ability to make a living and pay the bills.

Violating his 1st Amendment rights.

And just take the entire, second sentence of the Declaration of Independence and throw into a shredder.


9 posted on 03/05/2019 6:55:52 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I thought she deals with Manafort next week. Ellis (the other judge) was the one that dealt with Manafort.


10 posted on 03/05/2019 6:56:23 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Impeached? I think that’s a little light, as far as punishment goes.

But, damn near every thing about this case wreaks of desperation on the part of the Left.


11 posted on 03/05/2019 6:58:34 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron
Prior restraint of speech is unconstitutional.

And "criticizing him and his lawyers for failing to tell her when she issued a gag order that his latest book – which includes slashing commentary about Special Counsel Robert Mueller – was already on sale."

You know, the fact was out there in the open for anyone to raise, and if Special Counsel Mueller cared about the issue he could have raised it.

12 posted on 03/05/2019 6:58:49 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Essentially she is arguing that Stone’s attorneys should help in the effort to prosecute him.


13 posted on 03/05/2019 7:01:56 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
the entire, second sentence of the Declaration of Independence and throw into a shredder.

What, this? "...it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Totally unnecessary. We have this leftist hack judge looking after our safety and happiness as is her power as a black robed tyrant.

14 posted on 03/05/2019 7:02:57 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TLI

terrified that truth will be known


15 posted on 03/05/2019 7:03:06 PM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

She is a very biased liberal hack, which is why all mueller’s cases go before her. The courts are packed with biased liberal judges who could care less what the laws or constitution says.
////////////////////////
We are up a certain type of creek without a paddle.

Who are 90% of our judges ?
Liberal teachings in K-12, then leftist indoctrination in college, then socialist tilted law school then become ultra left judges who used to be lawyers and were then on the list of people no one knows on every ballot, or just appointed as a political hack.

That is our justice system.


16 posted on 03/05/2019 7:04:28 PM PST by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we're finishid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Nazi’s on parade.


17 posted on 03/05/2019 7:06:40 PM PST by semaj (We are the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

This whole witch hunt against Trump reminds me of the Demi Moore, Michel Douglas movie Disclosure. Demi Moore sets up Douglas to take the fall to cover up her misdoings. She was very sly and thorough. Good movie.

However this crap with Stone is not a movie. I truly think all this mess is to protect the 0bammy. I sure wish Trump would start releasing the FISA documents.


18 posted on 03/05/2019 7:10:13 PM PST by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar and Hates.........he just hates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Fairly sure stone can’t tell the publisher to stop.


19 posted on 03/05/2019 7:10:32 PM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Hello.

This is constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.


20 posted on 03/05/2019 7:13:19 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson