That was my first thought too.
Man, I hate the US media.
Terror attacks by Muslims occur 94,673% more often but only receive 357% more press attention than other terror attacks, study finds.
The real truth is that any time Muslims are involved with a crime the media tries to cover it up. Often they won’t even report the crime itself.
what utter bullsheit!
often, Moslem terrorist attacks on Americans are covered up or made to sound like simple ‘parking space disputes’ when the terrorist screams Alluh Akbar and Death to America!
Go figure... flying a plane into a skyscraper gets more attention than spraying graffiti on a banner!
It just doesn’t seem to occur to them that it might
be because there are 357% more islamic terrorism?
This is such a bald-faced lie. Which end of their ass did they pull the 357% from?
Ummm, what other ‘terrorists’ are there?
Freepers - I commented on this web page with “Dissenter”, a plugin that lets you comment on any web page on the internet.
It requires a gab.com account - a platform committed to free speech.
Warning: the only moderation is for porn and posts that are not marked “NSFW” (not safe for work) that should be. Outside that it is raw free speech - thin skinned probably shouldn’t join.
...but having the ability to comment on CNN/MSNBS/TheGuardian/WaPo/etc is making their heads explode.
Not counting workplace violence.
They try to paint the “white” or “non-muslim” terrorists as KKK, Neo-Nazis, Trump supporters and the like. But the truth is, almost all non-muslim terror attacks are ANTIFA, Occupy, Communist/Socialist, Environmentalists and other far left groups. They are not significantly reported by the media because the media wants to minimize their violence.
Somewhere, there’s more than a small sack of CAIR money behind this.
There are 357% more Muslim terrorist attacks than there are ANY OTHERS. duh.
The graphic used is laughable. One one side it’s a KKK head mask with blue eyes, and on the other it’s Osama.
I can think of some 357 attention they should get.
Preemptively.
> Which other group... <
Bingo! And that’s something the study didn’t bother to factor in. Muslim terror is terror by people all from the same GROUP. There is an ongoing common thread.
So yes, that’s going to attract a lot of attention.
Suppose there were 12 acts of arson in a city last year. And suppose half of those were committed by members of the same family. The other acts were not connected to each other. You can bet that this family would be getting a lot of attention.
And folks would be wondering, just what is the deal with this family?
“..., spending time and money on a worthless study like this?...”
and probably paid for taxpayers.
The difference is probably because Muslims commit 357% more terrorist acts than non-Muslims.
It could be because of that whole 9/11 thing and a number of other mass casualty terror attacks. Also the fact is that most terrorists are Muslim. So there are your reasons.
Because this is global terrorism. They are not lone wolves.
The real lone wolves are the ones who are not Mohammedan.