Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department
Huffpost ^ | 3/2/19 | Mary Papenfuss

Posted on 03/02/2019 4:42:48 AM PST by DoodleDawg

orth Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

(Excerpt) Read more at huffpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hanoisummit; kim; summit; trump; trumpkim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: DoodleDawg; All
Hmmm... there is a term whose definition is, "giving aid and comfort to the enemy".

Would some astute FReeper please remind us of what that term is?


41 posted on 03/02/2019 2:42:33 PM PST by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! | Remember Goliad! | REPEAT San Jacinto!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Would some astute FReeper please remind us of what that term is?

While we might term it one thing, a democrat would call it "patriotism".

42 posted on 03/02/2019 2:47:56 PM PST by damper99 (pu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

I think you’re confusing the total amount of money transferred to Iran with the subset of that money transferred in cash on pallets. The pallet money is usually reported to be around 1.5 billion dollars. Still a scandalous amount, of course.


43 posted on 03/02/2019 9:39:22 PM PST by pluvmantelo (The 'T' stands for Travesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson