Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x; BenLurkin
"Tell them it "wasn't actually a civil war" ..."

I think the OP meant the literal definition of "Civil War", which is multiple sides within a country fighting for control of the government, which it wasn't. The Confederacy wanted to leave and govern itself, making it more closely related to The Revolutionary War (a "rebellion").

82 posted on 03/01/2019 11:06:00 AM PST by 10mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 10mm
That line is a blurry one. The English Civil War was also a revolution. Many people say the American Revolution was also a civil war.

If you were in Maryland or Kentucky or Missouri or some other places, the American Civil War was very much a civil war.

South Carolinians thought they were making a revolution in 1861, but when being revolutionary came to be seen as a bad thing, they started pushing "The War Between the States" with some holding out for "The War of Northern Aggression."

For the US government it was originally "The War of the Rebellion," but "The Civil War" came to be regarded as more neutral.

For me, there were enough brothers fighting brothers and families torn apart and enough real aggressiveness on both sides to justify calling it a civil war.

102 posted on 03/01/2019 1:42:35 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson