Posted on 02/23/2019 8:17:32 AM PST by ebb tide
The bishops discussed how to make themselves accountable, but will this be enough for the victims around the world?
(ROME February 22nd, 2019) Accountability: that was the theme chosen for Day 2 of the meeting for the protection of minors taking place this week at the Vatican.
An address by the Archbishop of Mumbai, Cardinal Oswald Gracias, set the tone for the day. His Eminence focused primarily on bishops accountability to each other in the key of collegiality and spoke of the bishops need to engender and foster a sense of accountability to each other.
Because we belong to the college of bishops in union with the Holy Father, Cardinal Gracias said, we all share accountability and responsibility. He went on to say, [D]o we really engage in an open conversation and point out honestly to our brother bishops or priests when we notice problematic behaviour in them?
We should cultivate a culture of correctio fraterna (fraternal correction) which enables this without offending each other[.]
Whatever the merits of those concerns, they do not speak directly to the kind of accountability for which thousands of long-suffering and egregiously injured victims throughout the world, along with the sorely tried faithful insulted and aggrieved for their sake, are impatient.
Cardinal Gracias who has been accused of seriously mishandling a 2015 case did not appear before journalists on Friday at the press briefing following the morning session.
The President of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, Cardinal Sean OMalley of Boston who was not a member of the committee Pope Francis appointed to organise the meeting, and whose name is conspicuously absent from the roster of speakers over the three days of sessions was on the dais Friday.
Reminded by a journalist that Theodore McCarrick was the reassuring face of the US bishops in 2002, when they were summoned to Rome when the scandal of abuse exploded in that year, and asked what he could say to reassure the faithful that a similar episode could never repeat itself, Cardinal OMalley said, We are talking today about collegiality about our obligation to each other I would hope that any bishop, who is aware of this kind of misbehaviour, would certainly make that known to the Holy See, and not feel that in any way we should try to cover it up or turn a blind eye to it.
McCarrick was on the Holy Sees radar as early as 1994.
Cardinal OMalleys response to the question came after the Archbishop of Chicago, Cardinal Blase Cupich, spoke to the same question. The only thing that I can tell you, said Cardinal Cupich, is that I, and everyone else, has to be held accountable and Ive always believed that. Cardinal Cupich went on to say, [T]his is a matter, first of all, of accountability on my part: that I am going to live my life this way, i.e. as a Christian disciple ought, and then, to make sure that we are supportive of each other to live the Gospel.
Cardinal Cupich was the second speaker at the morning session, and presented an outline of his metropolitan proposal, i.e. to use the Metropolitan Archbishop in charge of the ecclesiastical province or metropolis to investigate, prosecute, and try a bishop accused of negligence, coverup, or other malfeasance.
Reminded by a journalist that Theodore McCarrick was a metropolitan, Cardinal Cupich directed his questioner to the footnotes of his text, where he discusses the possible alternatives in such an eventuality. That discussion, by the way, can be found in note 6 of Cardinal Cupichs text, available at www.pbc2019.org
Another significant highlight during the press briefing was the discussion entertained over Point 15 of Pope Franciss reflection points for the meeting participants, which he distributed Thursday at the beginning of the meeting. The point reads:
Observe the traditional principle of proportionality of punishment with respect to the crime committed. To decide that priests and bishops guilty of sexual abuse of minors leave the public ministry.
Journalists have noted the ambiguity of the text. It seems to call for prudential consideration of penalties according to the principle of proportionality roughly, let the punishment fit the crime. It might open the possibility of applying permanent removal as the penalty for every abuse offence, or not. The second sentence seems to encourage bishops to apply the so-called one strike policy, but does not propose that the rule already in force in many Anglophone jurisdictions become universal law.
I would advocate that, i.e. the one-strike policy, for everyone, said Cardinal OMalley.
What the Pope meant in saying it remains unclear.
Ping
Bishops, cardinals continue to fudge difficult questions at Vatican abuse summit
Why is it so hard for these supposed men of God to condemn this horrible abuse? What about the victims?
1 - Past sins to be litigated.
2- Current, Active, Unrepentant Homosexuals.
Category 2 = GET OUT OF THE PRIESTHOOD NOW!
The membership of this church: time to just admit you're being chronically and willfully lied to. Whatever the church might once have been, its unrecoverably rotted absolutely through to the core and at this point the core has entirely rotted.
Tear down this building rebuild it starting with whatever few uncorrupted scraps are left.
We know that each hour this fake circus continues ... each hour more kids are being manipulated right into the bedrooms of these perverts.
Members, make it stop, even if it means tearing down the church you love. This is no longer you church. What the heck do you think the meaning behind the resurrection is? It's not just men that require new birth.
All worldly things eventually rot.
What the church once represented is not worldly, but the church itself is. And it's begging for someone to put a skewer through it.
Someone needs to enforce our existing laws and put more of these criminals in prison. The church is not a law unto itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.