Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; jacquej; fieldmarshaldj

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1091_5536.pdf

It was 9-0

Thomas wrote his own concurring opinion


24 posted on 02/20/2019 10:38:14 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: campaignPete R-CT

The Supreme Court has not had many 9-0 decisions in its history. This is a good one.


28 posted on 02/20/2019 10:42:26 AM PST by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: campaignPete R-CT; grey_whiskers; jacquej; fieldmarshaldj; Impy

“It was 9-0

Thomas wrote his own concurring opinion”

_____________

Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment, but did not sign on to the Opinion of the Court, so, legally speaking, it was 9-0 *on the judgment*, but it was only 8-0 *on the opinion*.


90 posted on 02/20/2019 12:58:30 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson