Posted on 02/18/2019 9:45:24 PM PST by tcrlaf
New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is going to great lengths to establish her far-left bona fides heading into the Democrats POTUS primary. This weekend she upped the ante even further by jumping onto the transgender rights bandwagon. When asked by a reporter, Gillibrand indicated that she would certainly be in favor of recognizing a third gender (defined as X or none of the above) at the federal level. (The Hill
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) reportedly said she would support for federal recognition of a third gender Friday at a campaign event in New Hampshire.
The senator, who is running for president in 2020, told a room of LGBTQ activists that she would support a third designation of X at the federal level for those not identifying as a man or woman, according to CBS News.
Yes, Gillibrand said when asked if she would support such a designation at the federal level, according to CBS, which noted that she received applause from activists for her quick answer.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Why do you hate rocks?
There are two sexes. Gender is for Spanish nouns.
We need to Federally recognize the stupidiousness of liberals.
Actually there three genders. There are the feminine gender[ she, her], the masculine gender [he, him], and the neutral gender [they, them] . There are only two sexes, however, female and male. At birth they are differentiated by the plumbing. If the plumbing is on the inside, it is a female. If the plumbing is on the outside, it is a male. As they age, different glands in the females and males will do their jobs and the differences between the two will be made more obvious.
This LIB lunatic is a “three-ist”! How dare she fail to recognize ALL the lunatics’ genders? Many likely have multiple genders. Down with “Threeism”!!!
Yes, let’s defy nature, let’s defy the sex-specific DNA at the nucleus of every human cell, the DNA that triggers all the sex-distinct biological life of humans. Yes, let’s pretend that a mental obsession should be honored as “normal”. Let’s NOT.
If all definitions of sex and gender are eliminated, won’t that make gender discrimination impossible?
I have never voted for her. If I had a dartboard, she'd be featured on it, alongside DumblASSio, Bloomberg, Odungo & Schumer.
LOL... you neglected to mention the blowhard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.