I’m talking about judicial jurisdiction, not “where the problem ends up.”
The latter has no relevance to the jurisdiction.
Once the invasion is checked, the solutions elsewhere are far more easily enacted.
“I’m talking about judicial jurisdiction”
I’m not a legal expert. It’s plain common sense that a border state can’t simply say, “we don’t want a protected border” because the intruders move on into other states.
Border and immigration are controlled at the federal level. Given that, what rights do border states have?