Posted on 02/13/2019 8:55:29 AM PST by fishtank
Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence
January 2019 • Volume 48, Number 1 • Alex Berenson
Alex Berenson
"Seventy miles northwest of New York City is a hospital that looks like a prison, its drab brick buildings wrapped in layers of fencing and barbed wire. This grim facility is called the Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Institute. It’s one of three places the state of New York sends the criminally mentally ill—defendants judged not guilty by reason of insanity.
Until recently, my wife Jackie—Dr. Jacqueline Berenson—was a senior psychiatrist there. Many of Mid-Hudson’s 300 patients are killers and arsonists. At least one is a cannibal. Most have been diagnosed with psychotic disorders like schizophrenia that provoked them to violence against family members or strangers.
A couple of years ago, Jackie was telling me about a patient. In passing, she said something like, Of course he’d been smoking pot his whole life.
Of course? I said.
Yes, they all smoke.
So marijuana causes schizophrenia?
I was surprised, to say the least. I tended to be a libertarian on drugs."
(Excerpt) Read more at imprimis.hillsdale.edu ...
"Whether to use cannabis, or any drug, is a personal decision. Whether cannabis should be legal is a political issue. But its precise legal status is far less important than making sure that anyone who uses it is aware of its risks. Most cigarette smokers don’t die of lung cancer. But we have made it widely known that cigarettes cause cancer, full stop. Most people who drink and drive don’t have fatal accidents. But we have highlighted the cases of those who do.
We need equally unambiguous and well-funded advertising campaigns on the risks of cannabis. Instead, we are now in the worst of all worlds. Marijuana is legal in some states, illegal in others, dangerously potent, and sold without warnings everywhere.
But before we can do anything, we—especially cannabis advocates and those in the elite media who have for too long credulously accepted their claims—need to come to terms with the truth about the science on marijuana. That adjustment may be painful. But the alternative is far worse, as the patients at Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Institute—and their victims—know."
Saw my link, didya?
This is where decades of poisoning the well with WoD reefer madness propaganda comes into play.
Ain’t a damn thing that can come out about it that can be believed at this point. Including this article.
Alcohol is worse. I’ve seen it.
A good article
And a refreshing alternative to the “drugs are personal liberty” contingent.
A large swath of druggies in the America (regardless of what other politics they are interested in) react to any cautionary words about marijuana with hysterical rants about “Reefer Madness! Reefer Madness! Reefer Madness!”.
Just like with leftists on ANY subject, rational conversations are impossible.
For your interest.
Looking at that picture, I think someone is trying to tunnel out.
Are you inferring that because alcohol is worse that this is okay?
I think so, that’s how I read what you said.
My inference is, if alcohol is worse than pot, why is alcohol legal and pot is not?
It's impossible for us to have a rational conversation with an addict. We all have known an addict. Alcoholic. Drugs. Maybe gambling.
They're devoted to their addiction. That's all that matter to them.
Rational conversations with prohibitionists are impossible because prohibition is extremely irrational.
Rational people react poorly to anti-cannabis propaganda because people just don’t like being lied to or being slandered as “druggies” for not buying into it. The ad hominem serves to solidify the impression that prohibitionists are every bit as dishonest as any other leftist.
“wrapped in layers of fencing and barbed wire”?
Free countries don't have stats like this.
This BS trope has been published here half a dozen times.
And has been debunked each time.
Crazy people should not smoke pot. Everyone knows that already. They shouldn’t drink whiskey or take ANY mind altering substance.
Because they are CRAZY!
“The ad hominem serves to solidify the impression that prohibitionists are every bit as dishonest as any other leftist.”
It’s prima facie proof.
It is. And if they knew the slightest bit about how it became illegal in the first place, they’d realize that they are STILL buying into “fake news” that is almost a century old.
It’s literally illegal because a big newspaper publisher (Hearst) didn’t want cheaper hemp paper competing with his paper mill empire, and he used his control over newspapers to produce fake news to create a nationwide hysteria against it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.