So if it is the truth, how is it homophobic to say that homosexuals are in charge? Assuming it’s a true statement, and homosexuals have major positions of power?
People ask the same sort of question when people who brag about running Detroit are pointed out as the ones running Detroit, people who brag about running Hollywood are pointed out as the ones running Hollywood, billionaires who brag about running the Democrat Party are pointed out as the ones running the Democrat Party . . . and so on about a dozen others or more.
Being the aggrieved party is all they know how to blabber about and they can't risk anyone realizing they're the ones in power and not the ones being oppressed.
It goes against the "homosexuals are victims" narrative, and is therefore homophobic.
That's my theory anyway.
If he had said that the City Council was controlled by assorted Marxists they wouldn’t have attacked him. That is one truth they know about.
In the old days it was Communist Party USA member Miriam Friedlander and Democratic Socialist/friend of the CP, Ruth Messinger.
Now the council has a lot of different Marxist ideology sympathizers including one Maoist.