"Sometimes the questions are good and thoughtful, sometimes theyre compound and incomprehensible, but you have to answer every one with a degree of civility and dignity, and that was sorely lacking. When every question is a GOTCHA questions and perjury trap it's only fitting to point this out to the public.
They clearly offered no degree of civility and dignity in their questioning and they deserved no respect.
Question.
I'm sure they can accuse Mr. Whitaker with 'contempt' or other claims but what, if anything, can they charge Mr. Whitaker for in how he answered?
Can he be fined or prosecuted?
Is there an actionable offense Mr. Whitaker can be charged with and what would be the punishment?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: yesthatjallen
Former senior FBI official Chuck Rosenberg....
*********************************
I am SOOOO glad that this A-hole has the word Former affixed before his title. One more Deep Stater out of the Swamp.
2 posted on
02/08/2019 10:20:25 PM PST by
House Atreides
(Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENT)
To: yesthatjallen
Matt Whitaker for President, 2024 !
3 posted on
02/08/2019 10:21:40 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
("It's Slappin' Time !")
To: yesthatjallen
Every one of Whitaker’s inquisitors should have been arrested and immediately incarcerated in the renovated and re-commissioned Federal political prison on Alcatraz Island .
To: yesthatjallen
How dare him not grovel at their feet.
7 posted on
02/08/2019 10:27:23 PM PST by
Ken H
(2019 => The House of Representin')
To: yesthatjallen
whitaker was not under oath as i understand so...
9 posted on
02/08/2019 10:32:45 PM PST by
SteveH
To: yesthatjallen
Whittaker did just what he needed to do.
BS on the former “official”
10 posted on
02/08/2019 10:37:34 PM PST by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just hava few days that don't suck.)
To: yesthatjallen
Being hauled before those criminals and having to pretend that they have any legitimacy is degrading in itself.
To: yesthatjallen; All
I watched a few clips and it was outrageous how they were badgering him for yes or no answers for questions that werent straightforward or changed while they were being asked. The Chairman interrupted himself and read a prepared statement claiming Whitaker hadnt answered his questions when he clearly had. Thats how he ran out of his five minutes which Whiticker pointed out.
He wasnt walking into the traps set down.
Then we had Mr. Richmond telling him he needs more brown and black people at DOJ, women too.
Whitaker was very patient. I applaud him.
13 posted on
02/08/2019 10:46:57 PM PST by
newzjunkey
(WALL. NO AMNESTY.)
To: yesthatjallen
"Rosenberg served as Chief of Staff to the Director of the FBI from 2013 to 2015. In this role,
he worked closely with Director James Comey and other senior FBI officials on counterterrorism, intelligence, cyber and criminal investigative issues, including with international, federal, state and local law enforcement partners. . .Throughout his distinguished career in law enforcement and public service,
Chuck has earned the trust and the praise of his colleagues at every level, said former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. . .
On August 2017, Rosenberg found himself at odds with the Trump administration over the President's remarks encouraging the police to rough up suspects.[7] His internal memo to the DEA workforce gained public attention for Rosenberg's repudiation of Trump's remarks. In it, Rosenberg wrote "The President, in remarks delivered yesterday in New York, condoned police misconduct regarding the treatment of individuals placed under arrest by law enforcement... I write to offer a strong reaffirmation of the operating principles to which we, as law enforcement professionals, adhere. I write because we have an obligation to speak out when something is wrong. Thats what law enforcement officers do. Thats what you do. We fix stuff. At least, we try."[8] The Washington Post Editorial Board, in a piece titled "A divided nation gets moral guidance - but not from Trump" wrote "His letter was important not as a rebuke to the president but as a model of leadership and courage in reaffirming democratic values.". . .
On September 26, 2017, it was announced that Rosenberg, dismayed by the Trump administration, was stepping down.[10][11] His resignation became effective October 1, 2017.[12][13] It was announced on October 3, 2017 that Robert W. Patterson, who had been serving as the DEA's Principal Deputy Administrator since November 2016,[14] had succeeded Rosenberg as Acting Administrator for the DEA.[12]. . .
On November 13, 2017, Rosenberg initiated his role as an MSNBC News contributor with an interview on The Rachel Maddow Show.":
Chuck Rosenberg
14 posted on
02/08/2019 10:49:35 PM PST by
Fedora
To: yesthatjallen
15 posted on
02/08/2019 10:49:36 PM PST by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: yesthatjallen
The main thing this hack is ignoring is the fact that Whitaker only has days left before retirement. Why on earth would he *NOT* take advantage of an opportunity to stick it back to these hostile clowns, when there's no consequences for him?
You only get exactly one chance (per career) to say, "TAKE THIS JOB AND SHOVE IT!"
16 posted on
02/08/2019 10:50:28 PM PST by
CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
("Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt" - Pr. Herbert Hoover)
To: yesthatjallen
Ah yes. Civility.
To: yesthatjallen
I think Whitaker gave the committee the level of respect that they deserved. After Nadler threatened him with a subpoena and all the back and forth that went on regarding that issue, it was obvious the gloves were off on both sides.
18 posted on
02/08/2019 10:52:40 PM PST by
Qiviut
(McCain & Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMP!)
To: yesthatjallen
He’ll be out of there in a week. He was a temp, a hired interim manager. He knew it, too. They just wanted to get him on the record either to use it against him or someone else. He wasn’t buying any of it.
No, afaik they can’t do jack about it. Generally “contempt of Congress” is the refusal to appear under subpoena. If you are subpoenad you have to appear but can refuse to answer. Whitaker has 1st Amendment and 5th Amendment rights among others. He can talk to them with all the scorn and contempt he thinks they deserve.
It’s a kick to listen to some of the news clips of Howard Hughes telling Senator Brewster off... in 1947. He flat said “it is unfair to put me in the position of having my integrity questioned, and not allowing me to question the integrity of Senator Brewster”. Hughes believed Brewster was in the pocket of Pan-Am and working to thwart the expansion of TWA by being a crooked-azz hack. Which he was. Brewster was one of those “all my life serving the public” types, state assembly, governor, congressman, senator... almost no private sector experience... and he wore like a badge of honor but anyone with a lick of sense knows it means his only skill is graft and corruption.
I wish more people would do like Hughes did. But it was a different time.
To: yesthatjallen
There is much to fear from an implacable passive-aggressive with an I.Q. exponentially higher than the combined total of the committee. It was like watching a Sensei take out a class of arrogant white belts.
22 posted on
02/08/2019 11:06:48 PM PST by
davius
(You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
To: yesthatjallen
I thought the line of questioning of Whitaker resembled a kangaroo court. Most of the afternoon dealt with questions about the Mueller investigation. This was not a oversight hearing, it was a character assassination where Whitaker was not given the time to explain his answers. He was given only the answer yes or no to a statement that was calculated to get him no matter how he answered it. They constantly told him he was running the clock when he wanted to more completely explain his answers. And they wanted him to talk about conversations with the President when that information was privileged information. They used every trick in the book and they did not spare any disrespectful behavior.
26 posted on
02/08/2019 11:35:34 PM PST by
jonrick46
(Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
To: yesthatjallen
Rosenberg has emerged as a staunch critic of the Trump administration, often appearing on cable news to denounce what he says is the presidents mistreatment of the Justice Department.
Hill writer too stupid to notice baked in contradiction in this statement as the FBI goon is the one criticizing the DOJ official.
To: yesthatjallen
If you didn’t have Chuck Rosenberg on your Big List of Bad Actors Who Need To Be Brought To Justice, your list is incomplete.
28 posted on
02/08/2019 11:39:07 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(Nobody is coming to save the day)
To: yesthatjallen
FBI needs to be disbanded.
30 posted on
02/08/2019 11:54:35 PM PST by
NoLibZone
(Trump's exposed the life long, professional ruling class that can't be removed without violence.)
To: yesthatjallen
Is the author of this article related to David Axelrod?
32 posted on
02/08/2019 11:56:02 PM PST by
Obadiah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson