Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csvset

Impeachment is only for behavior while in office. As much as I dislike Northam, he did not violate law while in office. His support for infanticide could be considered an ethics violation and he should be investigated for that. But a photo from 30 years past is not an impeachable offence, unless the accused is Republican.


18 posted on 02/04/2019 8:40:18 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rjsimmon

I agree, Northam did nothing “illegal”, so I can’t see where impeachment would be an option. Knowing that impeachment is on shaky legal ground, the Dems will continue to howl for him to resign. If Northam is a real cool cucumber, could he, would he stay and fight ?


21 posted on 02/04/2019 8:51:32 AM PST by csvset (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: rjsimmon

he did not violate law while in office.


If he took the picture last week would he have broken any law? Poor taste/poor judgment, yes but a violation of a law?


25 posted on 02/04/2019 8:59:55 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson