When the argument is over whether or not to destroy and replace the Constitution, the result is civil war.
Guess which argument we are currently in the midst of?
If it tears the USA apart, so be it. That is better than forcing us to stay together like Lincoln did when he invaded the south in 1861. Millions died instead of simply allowing two different countries to exist.
JoMa
You can’t reason someone out of something they didn’t reason themselves into.
Cannibal and a pacifist are negotiating and the compromise is the cannibal will only eat the pacifist’s leg (for now)
#Incrementalism
I think Will is a little confused on Liberals vs The Left.
Unfortunately Owen is lying to himself. Liberals have always been about destroying the foundations of this country. The Overton window has just moved so far left they have dropped the pretense.
I was a little disappointed that he did not address the left’s ultimate goal.
Hitting them on gender and national values only scratches the surface, and only represents a means to their end.
Their ultimate goal is what it has always been since this country’s inception...
Replacing God-based capitalism with atheist based socialism/communism.
Propaganda is a time proven method for doing just that... and since truth is relative in their belief system, you are only bashing your head against a brick wall trying to argue with them. In any conversation, YOUR confusion is their goal... not finding the truth.
Yes you can. Slam them first for being Haters before they can get their digs in. Then say they have an agenda of hate. Hate for Catholic Christians (Covington). Hate for Americans and a love for gangs like MS-13 who murder them. Hatred for babies they wish kill both inside and outside the womb (Northam).
Slam them for Hating small states like Rhode Island and Hawaii - taking their influence away with the Electoral College. They hate America and it's freedoms and say they want us to become like Venezuela.
Slam them over and over until they are speechless
Way ahead of you, Denny.
I learned this at university in the 1970s: As a Christian and philosopher, I argued to arrive at mutual truth. I thus honestly considered the opposing views.
The leftists argued to destroy me and win at all costs, without ever sincerely considering my positions.
Prager is good, but like most of these vaunted pundits, he has to play catch up with “rubes” like me.
After more than half a century of hearing and reading the spokesmouths of the so-called intelligentsia, I am just not that easily impressed anymore.