“You’re relying on a biased writer’s account of the what happened when he wasn’t even there”
No, those were quotes from Acevedo himself.
“The fact the two were armed....”
No again. First only the man had a gun and last I checked American citizens have every right to be armed, especially in their own homes.
“If they were black....you would side with the cops”
No, yet again. I see all American citizens equally. It would have matter not if they were tiger striped.
“There won’t be any charges pressed against the officers”
Wow see, we can agree on something.
Now that you got that out of your system, and after my many posts understand where I am coming from, can you now explain to everyone why a no knock raid was the better option for a warrant with little to no true evidence? I mean no heroin was found, no 9mm was found, which are the EXACT reasons for the no knock warrant per the documents released?
It seems to me, that all this no knock did, was endanger all involved, while simultaneously stomping on American citizens rights.
Wrong. There were no quotes regarding when the siren and flashing lights were turned on. You quotes the writer of the article and he used the word meanwhile.