The only problem I see here is that South Dakota does not require applicants for a concealed weapons permit, which is going away, to undergo firearms safety training or demonstrate competence with a firearm.
I get the feeling, since I don’t trust liberals at all, this will be an opportunity for the libs to use as a showcase to find anything done wrong due to the lack of training requirements, and it will hit every major news outlet every time something happens. Hope this isn’t used to blow up in the faces of second amendment privilege people.
rwood
Redwood71: “The only problem I see here is that South Dakota does not require applicants for a concealed weapons permit, which is going away, to undergo firearms safety training or demonstrate competence with a firearm.”
Me: Garbage. While advisable to get training, to make it a requirement is asking government’s permission to exercise a constitutional right. Screw that.
______
______
Redwood71: Hope this isn’t used to blow up in the faces of second amendment privilege people.”
Me: Who are these “second amendment privilege people” you seem to hold in contempt? They sound pretty deplorable.