Posted on 01/29/2019 5:12:06 AM PST by Kaslin
Yes it’s immoral for them to be dressed like prostitues. That is a very conservative position.
Immoral to be encouraging sex responses and straying from what should be your committed partner. It ain’t right.
Would you want your mother or sister or daughter prancing around naked and sexually suggestively, never mind your wife? If so something is wrong with you.
No way, we all guessed the left correctly ; ) “Think as I do or else.......”
But it goes for the big colleges as well. It’s pointless when they are in big stadia. Who can see them for their cheer encouragement?
“why aren’t there scantily dressed male cheerleaders and dance teams?”
Because the women are ogling the men on the field.
Some is, of course, God's gift but to raise that gift to cheerleader level requires hard work and lots of it.
It also requires talent and dedication to the activity.
Beautiful women, do not be cowed (what an appropriate word) by the detractors.
This tread is worthless without pictures!!
Yes.
But seriously, cheer leading was meant to rouse the fans DURING plays, and in huge stadium you can’t see them. Pointless to just have them doing halftime shows.
Leave them to high school where they are visible.
I’ve been told that some women like the huddle more than the game.
And exactly what is wrong with male titillation?
Are you going to wage war on all the female titillation(and worse) that goes on when women pay a lot of money to invite male strippers to their hen nights and what not and the women abandon all female dignity, go wild and reach for the unmentionables of the male strippers?
Please. They are fully clothed IN ADDITION to having monstrous equipment which makes them like big robots. Can’t even see their faces to see if they’re good looking.
If you’ve ever attended an NFL game the cheerleaders are quite visible from the stands and of course on the jumbotron.
This is understandable when you realize the feminism at its core is an anti fertility cult. Also the significance that men find it inherently gratifying to watch attractive, young women at their sexual prime dancing and gyrating and the fact that the women themselves compete avidly and voluntarily for the jobs is lost on those who object.
On average, men like “eye candy” and women don’t care. We can’t have anything that shows a difference between men and women so it must be shut down. They can’t stop men from looking, so they must stop women from choosing to be looked at.
I don't see a problem with that.....
Pretty much.
Way to spoil it! Boo.
First off I don’t do that. Second who is most famous for being sexual and hiring strippers and going to clubs? Not women.
Apples and oranges anyway comparing ready-made public presentation to males vs a few people having to hire someone in the privacy of some home.
What’s wrong? Read my other comments.
You don’t have to have your eyeballs bleed trying to see them from the cheap seats. That’s what the jumbotrons are for, especially between plays when there’s not much going on to look at. Besides, it’s part of the team’s brand and is useful off the field, too. Or used to be. Sigh.
ROFL love it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.