Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
Great Britain was settled each time, and occupied for thousands of years, but the occupation may have ended with the next glaciation. Trouble with really thick glacier cover that goes on for hundreds of miles is, nothing much to eat, and no fuel for fires. Even the sudden formation of the English Channel didn't slow down prehistoric humans.
Also, I'm not on board any gradualist onset models.
It's interesting that "fossil" CO2 levels found in deep ice cores show that the CO2 levels rose 100s or 1000s of years *after* the world warmed back up.

58 posted on 01/29/2019 12:46:21 PM PST by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Yes, one of the major pieces of evidence IMHO in the climate debate is that the ice core data clearly shows CO2 levels are a lagging indicator behind temperatures. Yes, the two data points correlate, but saying CO2 levels drive temperatures is a classic post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

The ice core data also support that the onset of an ice age is rapid. I'm glad I won't live to have to cope with it.

Food production will rapidly decline. Glaciers don't come as far south as Colorado (mountain glaciers excepted) but this land will be useless. Weld County, Colorado, is one of the most productive agricultural counties in America. Next ice age, it will be tundra. Great Plains agriculture will be lost. Populations will flee south and there will be great wars over the reduced livable land.

If only the warmist fantasy was true.

59 posted on 01/29/2019 1:15:32 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson