Trump administration to force asylum seekers to wait in Mexico as soon as Friday, U.S. official says

The Washington Times ^ | January 24, 2019 | Elliot Spagat

[jazusamo]

A step in the right direction, praying it happens.

[mplc51]

Some Judge will get involved......

[Nateman]

It will come down to 2 people. If RBG does us the courtesy of leaving, one way or another , then America and the President will win , otherwise it all depends on the undependable Judge Roberts.

[shelterguy]

Some Judge will get involved......

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Screw em, ignore em. A judge recently ruled husseincare as being unConstitutional yet I have never heard anyone say it must be stopped immediately.

[animal172]

Does it really make a difference since so many will just cross illegally then demand asylum?

[rawcatslyentist]

RGB is long gone. They will keep her on ice till they regain the senate, or executive.

[Nateman]

One wonders if even RATs could keep it a secret. Maybe a bit of revenge spying on the Presidents part can settle that

[dhs12345]

Oh man, so many precedents are being set by the judges.

If we do have a Democrat president in the future, he or she will have a tough time, too and Democrats will be whining like they usually do (hypocrite babies).

Because be assured that we will demand equal application of the law.

[Bubba Gump Shrimp]

“RGB is long gone. They will keep her on ice till they regain the senate, or executive.”
.
.
.
I think this is a major reason why Pelosi doesn’t want a SOTU address. The SCOTUS is always in attendance, and they would have to wheel her out on a gurney with tubes. Pretty bad optics.

[jjotto]

Five USSC Justices skipped the last one, and Clarence Thomas rarely attends.

[upchuck]

Is the link broken? I get an error message.

[jazusamo]

Try this one, Wash Times is limiting access now and “Outline” gets past paywall, it was an outline link in my post.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/24/trump-administration-force-asylum-seekers-wait-mex/

[upchuck]

Thanks! I’ve about given up on the Wash Times because of their paywall.

[jazusamo]

I hear you but Outline has worked for me for several weeks with them, install it and see if it’ll work for you.

[Reddy]

Just wondering if this is true and that is why pelousy cancelled the SOTU?? Because Ruth buzzy isn’t around to attend, and they are trying to keep that a secret for some reason? 🤷‍♀️

[Reddy]

I SWEAR I did not read this before posting #15.... GMTA :)

[jazusamo]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

[EdnaMode]

That is good news.

[deport]

The SCOTUS is always in attendance, and they would have to
wheel her out on a gurney with tubes. Pretty bad optics.

**************

Go do an internet search for SCOTUS attendees to the State
of the Union address.

[upchuck]

I have the browser add-on Reader View. It takes any web page, strips out all the garbage and just gives you the text.

In the case of Wash Times, I click on the link and then while the page is loading, and before it can get to the subscription puke, I start Reader View. It gives me the text perfectly.