Posted on 01/24/2019 5:53:41 AM PST by vietvet67
I’m sure senator blue menthol would be happy to pin a medal on his fellow America-hating liar.
“I’m not saying he’s a lazy lying thieving meth head, I’m asking the question. Could he be a lazy, lying,thieving meth head? He resembles a lazy, lying, thieving meth head. Plus, a lot of people are saying he’s a lazy, lying, thieving meth head.”
Let me repeat that...
I’m not saying he’s a lazy lying thieving meth head, I’m asking the question. Could he be a lazy, lying,thieving meth head? He resembles a lazy, lying, thieving meth head. Plus, a lot of people are saying he’s a lazy, lying, thieving meth head.
He would be a Vietnam era veteran but didn’t serve in country.
******
According to 41 CFR 60-250.2 [Title 41 Public Contracts and Property Management; Subtitle B Other Provisions Relating to Public Contracts; Chapter 60 Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor; Part 60-250 Affirmative Action and Nondiscrimination Obligations of Contractors and Subcontractors Regarding Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, Recently Separated Veterans, and Other Protected Veterans; Subpart A Preliminary Matters, Equal Opportunity Clause], Veteran of the Vietnam era means “a person who:
(1) Served on active duty for a period of more than 180 days, and was discharged or released therefrom with other than a dishonorable discharge, if any part of such active duty occurred:
(i) In the Republic of Vietnam between February 28, 1961, and May 7, 1975; or
(ii) Between August 5, 1964, and May 7, 1975, in all other cases; or
(2) Was discharged or released from active duty for a service-connected disability if any part of such active duty was performed:
(i) In the Republic of Vietnam between February 28, 1961, and May 7, 1975; or
(ii) Between August 5, 1964, and May 7, 1975, in all other cases.”
https://definitions.uslegal.com/v/veteran-of-the-vietnam-era/
Just looking at this guy, would you even TOUCH him? I mean, like shake his hand? I mean, what did he shake last, without washing his hands?
Native American activist Vincent Schilling states: "The Native man is Nathan Phillips, an Omaha keeper of a sacred pipe and a Vietnam Veteran."
Vincent Schilling: Nathan Phillips is a Vietnam Veteran
Vincent Schilling changed this article to now say Nathan Phillips is a Vietnam-era veteran.
Here is evidence Vincent Schilling changed his article:
Nah, Phillips knows exactly what he is doing. The “Vietnam Vet” narrative is designed to give him more cred and plays into his victim-hood ideology, alluding to the mistreatment former service members endured after returning from the war. And since he’s Native American, that makes him a victim twice-over.
The one thing Phillips didn’t count on was conservative activists tracking down his DD214 and exposing his lies. Not that Phillips actually cares; the MSM is still providing cover for him. In his interview on “Today,” Savannah let Phillips describe his service, and he promptly lied (again), saying he never stated he served in Vietnam. Of course, you can easily find Chief Fullabull saying exactly that, in interviews as recently as three weeks ago.
If you watch the interivew, you’ll see Ms. Guthrie never touched on Phillips’s three AWOLs and his discharge as an E-1 (same rank he had upon entering the Marine Corps). And the WaPo is now claiming that Phillips’s description of his duty title as a “ReconRanger” was based on his work on the reservation at the time. And they wonder why the MSM is dying....
Phillips is anything but crazy. He’s conniving, manipulatie and knows the buttons to push to advance his version of events.
Marxist Left MSM plans went awry, ya think?
BeauBo, The Ann Coulter/Wall thread got pulled (don’t know why) and I wanted to thank you for the private email info in reply to my earlier post on that thread.
FYI, the system I am on is not friendly with private emails for security reasons so I have to step outside to check them, which I don’t often do. Prefer to just post public and keep things where no private messages are needed.
That said, thanks again for the detailed info. You didn’t cite a source so I don’t know if you have to be careful about where you obtained that level of contract detail. If its not sensitive, then its certainly the type of insight into whats really happening on the border that many on FR are interested in knowing and maybe you can post it in full on another thread.
FRegards,
He’s Stolen Valor with a lie. Why should one think him an Injun?
I follow the border wall contract awards in the open news. Armchair analyst - no special insider info.
If I need details for a posting, like I sent you, I go to the DHS website as an authoritative source.
Here is one of their announcements, for example: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/border-wall-contract-awards-california
I use the search box on hat page to look up the other awards.
The stuff I sent you was cut and pasted from two earlier postings. I put this kind of stuff out pretty regularly, as I have a particular interest in the wall project.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.