Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monkeyshine

Their only win would be the optics of not seeing the RBG seat go empty.


109 posted on 01/23/2019 5:55:18 PM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Boardwalk

You mean her seat at the speech (not on the bench, I presume). I thought some of the SC justices stopped going after that finger wagging session from Obama. Anyway, no big deal, not sure why SCOTUS is there, or even wants to be there. It’s not a cocktail party. Personally think it’s a win-win, either the Speaker caves in order to keep the speech in her chamber and for her members, or, it moves to the Senate (implicit threat that this will be the new precedent) and Speaker Nancy loses more than she bargained for. Imagine a SOTU where 90% of the House is simply unable to attend.


110 posted on 01/23/2019 5:58:49 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: Boardwalk

Nevermind, I read it backwards...doh!


111 posted on 01/23/2019 6:01:43 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson