Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

“It’s an existing design that can be put into production for U.S. ships in a short period of time so why not?”

And it’s a great design as outfitted.

Diesels for transit, LM2500 turbines for operations.

MK45 5in gun.

Aegis with 48 VLS tubes and SPY-1 radar.

Hangar, fuel and weapons support for a helo and/or drones.

And I guess at a little more than half the size of a Burke DDG it’s about as small a Frigate as the Navy will settle for.

I just hope we can get them delivered 3 per year at under $1B per unit.


17 posted on 01/23/2019 9:55:10 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

A tested design sounds like a good cost saving idea. The fleet needs to be expanded and quickly. I think some of the mothballed fleet needs to be re-commissioned as well. New Out of the Box Ideas need to be designed and launched like:
Small, fast, drone carriers, Silent electric hunter killer subs,and new monitors armed with a pair of rail guns.


18 posted on 01/23/2019 10:20:53 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Needs to be built here with US Steel and US labor. 100%.


27 posted on 01/23/2019 10:57:53 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson