Twitter Curation strives to fairly and accurately contextualize the nature of large conversations on the platform, said the spokeswoman. The original Covington video appeared on Friday night. However, the Curation team did not compile a Moment until additional news media reporting emerged to provide context to the video this included a source video interview with Nathan Phillips, which was featured in the Moment.
Twitter is run by hypocrites.
1 posted on
01/22/2019 1:07:33 PM PST by
detective
To: detective
“Twitter is run by hypocrites.” ...and used by idiots who enable their manipulation of public discourse.
2 posted on
01/22/2019 1:09:05 PM PST by
ManHunter
(You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
To: detective
Not hypocrites. Dedicated anti-American radicals.
3 posted on
01/22/2019 1:10:42 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: detective
You know, Brietbart can be garbage too. I’m no fan of Twitter, but this is not accurate:
“signaling endorsement of their messages by the company”
The blue check marks do NOT indicate that Twitter or anyone else endorses what the person tweets. It simply means that Twitter has taken extra steps to verify that the account is being run by who it claims to be. I know because I tried to get verified. It’s not easy.
Get your facts straight.
To: detective
When the revolution comes then the revolutionaries will remember the treason of Twitter.
5 posted on
01/22/2019 1:13:06 PM PST by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: detective
I hope that one of the lawsuits to be file is against Twitter for knowing being an accomplice in this crime. Twitter won’t even pull those types of comments because they all come from liberals.
6 posted on
01/22/2019 1:13:22 PM PST by
Revel
To: detective
It hypocrites; domestic enemies of America.
7 posted on
01/22/2019 1:13:59 PM PST by
polymuser
(It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
To: detective
They ought to bring a lawsuit against Twitter. That would be a major pay day. Teach them a lesson about free speech they won’t soon forget.
8 posted on
01/22/2019 1:17:36 PM PST by
jersey117
To: detective
So if the threats are genuine they are within Twitter’s guidelines. Don’t want any fake threats.
10 posted on
01/22/2019 1:24:14 PM PST by
luvbach1
(I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
To: detective
12 posted on
01/22/2019 1:36:47 PM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.S)
To: detective
16 posted on
01/22/2019 3:03:05 PM PST by
gaijin
To: detective
To Hell with Twitter.
Criminal laws were broken by numerous posters. Why haven’t any been arrested?
18 posted on
01/22/2019 4:21:00 PM PST by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: detective
I think they should allow all tweets instead of censoring - it would make it even more clear what we are fighting against and point out who/what our first targets should be when SHTF.
23 posted on
01/23/2019 3:08:05 AM PST by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: detective
The time is coming that living in the same space with these hideous people will not just be intolerable, it will be very dangerous.
30 posted on
01/23/2019 4:59:34 AM PST by
dforest
(Just shut up Obama. Maybe everyone should just shut up!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson