[Wayne07]

Is 7% really catastrophic?

[Secret Agent Man]

Its pretty bad.

[Moonman62]

TSLA stock tends to make big swings in both directions.

[TigersEye]

Is 7% really catastrophic?

3,000 jobs? Nothing good about it but calling it "a catastrophic blow to its U.S. workforce" sounds like major hyperbole to me.

[Nifster]

When you already can’t meet his production demands? Yeah.....because he’s either getting rid of sales or manufacturing or what’s left of his engineering staff

[Osage Orange]

Tesla is choking on it's own vomit...

So yeah..it ain't good.

[dangus]

Building a factory is a different workforce than operating a factory. Tesla no longer faces do-or-die goals; it can be profitable enough with its current product to fund its future products without desperate leveraging.

The bad news is simply that Musk shows he has no loyalty to his workforce.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Is 7% really catastrophic?93% of Tesla workers say "No."

Let's put this in perspective. If Trump RIF'd a few hundred thousand "non-essential" government employees... say 7 to 10 percent, would it be catastrophic?

[NorthMountain]

Is 7% really catastrophic?

At 10%, he'd be literally "decimating" the workforce.

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

No, but this is not the behavior of a company that is working out it’s problem, getting back on track, and getting those cars rolling. Tesla will fold and wind up being a rich guy’s tax write-off, just like every other energy scam before it.