Posted on 01/19/2019 2:50:17 PM PST by Libloather
**SNIP**
Four organizations have sued the national Women's March group — led by activists Bob Bland, Tamika Mallory, Carmen Perez and Linda Sarsour — over efforts to trademark the name, arguing that no entity can own the march or the activism it has inspired. Some groups have sought to rebrand to shed the "Women's March" name and the tumult that comes with it.
As they prepare for the third annual Women's March on Saturday, leaders are grappling with the question: What is in a name, and is the name "Women's March" worth fighting for?
"There's power in the name because of what we've all done and the movement we've all created," said Katherine Siemionko, who founded Women's March Alliance, a New York organization that will lead a Manhattan march Saturday, and who organized the first Women's March there in 2017. "But then having the name also ties us to a group we have nothing to do with. And that's been a problem for us this year."
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
IOW, they're lying. Lying is what liars do.
Sounds great.
Also, I’m still blushing being in the company of the distinguished FReepers you sent this reply to: Jim Robinson and Liz. I’ll try to not let it go to my head.
You probably not want to see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.