Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

In other words, Rubio’s motion is only a repeat of a law already on the books?

Yet another reason that EVERY law should have a sunset clause. If it isn’t reviewed and re-authorized, it becomes null and void.

I think 5 years or so is a reasonable length of time for the effective period of any and every law. If it is effective, there should be no problem with re-authorization.

Constitutional Amendment, anyone?

Think about it: every lawmaker would be so busy reviewing old laws that they wouldn’t have time to think up new ways to infringe on our rights!


3 posted on 01/19/2019 10:47:55 AM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Don W

“In other words, Rubio’s motion is only a repeat of a law already on the books?”

No, while it is true that everyone is ignoring the law already on the books.

And it is true that politicians repeatedly try to sell us on solving problems that are already solved and passing laws that duplicate laws already existing,

Rubio’s law is designed to EXPAND ON the existing law and strengthen it.

Among other things, Rubio’s law would empower State governments and local governments to refuse to do business with companies participating in the BDS boycott of Israel.


20 posted on 01/19/2019 7:54:31 PM PST by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson