Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham

Well for your first paragraph, I would certainly expect that the executive would follow the rulings of the judiciary. That’s just common sense. Without that, we have no protection from executive overreach. For your second paragraph I agree. Even with cases brought before them, there are jurisdiction questions. No federal judge in East Podunk should be able to rule on the entire US.


185 posted on 01/19/2019 3:56:38 PM PST by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
"I would certainly expect that the executive would follow the rulings of the judiciary. That’s just common sense. Without that, we have no protection from executive overreach."

The Judicial branch needs to follow the Constitution and obey it. The executive branch being co-equal is our protection from JUDICIAL overreach. There are instances where it needs to be used in that fashion, especially in areas such as immigration where the executive branch has the constitutional authority and the judicial branch has none. I would hope that the President protects his turf as is his constitutional duty to do so. THAT is common sense and the way that our founders intended.

187 posted on 01/19/2019 5:03:50 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson