Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ETCS

I’m not ignorant and screw you for making such a statement. The SM Observer was the first to report Ginsberg’s cancer and while Snopes (and apparently you) called it false, it actually turned out to be true.

I have no love for that particular publication but you can kiss my ass if you think you can lump me in a group you label as “ignorant” without any push back.


61 posted on 01/18/2019 5:38:26 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: austinaero

Try to keep it civil here. In the end we are all on the same side. Ignorance is not stupidity, nor is it an insult. It means “lacking knowledge or awareness”. Push away, but if the shoe fits...

BTW, their fake story did not “turn out to be true”. They had no idea she had cancer. In fact, they reported she had malignant melanoma, not cancerous growths on her left lung, which seems pretty likely would be detected with chest x-rays when she injured her ribs.

They have a fair chance of getting the pneumonia story right, only because it is a highly likely complication for someone her age after a rib injury and a lobectomy.


84 posted on 01/18/2019 8:47:33 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson