Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JME_FAN

That was already ruled on in SCOTUS years ago. This judge should be impeached.


3 posted on 01/14/2019 4:48:35 PM PST by Mikemurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mikemurphy

It seems like I heard this was all straightened out. Don’t they know how to fix things permanently any longer??


16 posted on 01/14/2019 5:11:10 PM PST by Tomato lover (Words matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mikemurphy

I know, right? Didn’t the SCOTUS definitively put this to bed?


18 posted on 01/14/2019 5:11:37 PM PST by fwdude (Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what it allows with impunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mikemurphy

SCOTUS didn’t rule on it, they returned it to the Appeals Court to “negotiate” more acceptable rules so they wouldn’t have to baldly rule on 1st ammendment grounds.

This Federal Appeals judge is just being an asshat, because the court has changed and when this comes back before them, they are going to bitchslap him hard.


64 posted on 01/15/2019 12:14:08 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson