Sara Gorman, PhD, MPH, is a public health specialist, and Jack M. Gorman, MD, is a psychiatrist.
Joseph Goebbels was a German Nazi politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945.
Climate change denier and proud of it.
"Shut up," the psychologist argued.
Psychology/psychiatry are made-up pseudo sciences, and many of their practitioners suffer from the maladies they claim to address.
Bullshit. They can repeat it, but offer NO Proof.
Science demands verifiable proof, not two blowhards, spouting their religious beliefs.
We can affirm without doubt that anthropogenic climate change is a real phenomenon
Global Warming and now Climate Change was created by the elite Ruling Class as another means to control and dictate how to live your life to the masses. Man made Climate Change is Bull Crap.
It’s like an article from Soviet Life.
Well, here’s one very famous psychologist, who says “climate change” , is a lie.
https://cliscep.com/2018/11/08/jordan-peterson-on-climate-change/
Religion is religion and climate change/evolution are the state religion.
> We can affirm without doubt ...
Fortunately science (which I’m sure the author cares deeply about) has developed over the last few hundred years with a number of practices broadly called “the scientific method”. Part of this is testing and predicting. So the author should be able to list all of the predictions that have come to pass
* ice-free arctic
* decline of polar bear population
* snow-free north west and ski slopes shutting down all over
* magnitude of temperature increase relative to CO2 presented to congress by Hansen in the 1980s (magnitude, not just direction, is critical since magnitude, not direction is what will kill us)
Those are few of the public predictions (which activist scientists didn’t argue with at the time). If you want to change my mind, list the predictions that have been shown to be accurate - that’s how science can be trusted. There are plenty of less public predictions too (e.g. distribution of water vapor in the troposphere, heat hiding in the oceans, etc). If this is about science, tell us the scientific results. And if there is “no doubt”, there should be a lot of predictions that have been accurate. But the author doesn’t seems to care about science.
“The fact is that many people born this year will not survive global warming if it continues at the current pace and exceeds 3.50C by 2050.”
reminds me of predictions from another climate change sage:
“On 14 December 2009, during a speech at the Copenhagen Climate Conference, Gore cited newer research from the same group: These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”
We can NOT affirm without a doubt that anthropogenic climate change is a real phenomenon.
On what basis would a psychologist make such a wild statement? The science of climate change is far from settled.
No you cannot. Because anthropogenic climate change is absolute nonsense with no basis in fact! It is a liberal myth morphed into a political agenda. Man has no impact on climate. The determining factor of climate change is and always has been solar activity, not man.
The article's authors are projecting their climate fantasies on those who engage in rational thought and reject those fantasies as without merit. The authors are prime examples of overly educated professionals who delude themselves into believing their narrow professional accomplishments extend their expertise to all fields of research.
I note that the article's authors do not call their fantasy "global warming" but "climate change". By that small change of phrase they are also deniers. But more to the point, I am heartily sick and tired of this propaganda catchphrase of "climate change deniers". It's akin to calling someone who thoroughly chews his food while dining in a restaurant as a "public masticator".
What the country needs is an accurate appellation for those of the authors' ilk. I suggest "climate pimps".
Sara Gorman, Ph.D., MPH, and Jack M. Gorman, MD
Scary thing is these two Look Normal.
But their thinking is deadly dangerous.
I love how they can cite things without any facts. I suppose facts are not necessary when getting a degree in a fake non-science.
Facing the reality of climate change is terrifying.
Why, New York and Miami are under 2 feet of water, the polar ice caps have melted, half the human population on earth has starved to death and we have completely depleted the supply of fossil fuels. Total disaster looms.
What do you mean that hasn’t happened?? It was all predicted, certainly by 2015. ——Nope.
Well, it must all be a CROCK of SH!T!
Except it is these 2 communism evil deniers who are ignoring that warming has always preceded carbon release locked in the ice otherwise.
Apparently I and everyone I know needs treatment.
Will psychologists investigate the mass hysteria formerly known as global warming, and now as climate change?
What drives people to abandon their own critical thinking and join a cult?
What causes people to hate others just because they don’t hold the same views? Lack of self confidence? feelings of inadequacy?
Ad what point people subjugate their id to a person of seemingly higher will?
Will you succumb to peer pressure?
These are the questions the psychologists should be asking, not the garbage that was posted.