Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump, Following Explosive News Reports, Denies He Worked For Russia
NPR ^ | Jan. 14, 2019 | Philip Ewing

Posted on 01/14/2019 10:16:07 AM PST by Innovative

President Trump on Monday denied that he has been trying to conceal details about his discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin after a pair of explosive press reports over the weekend.

"I never worked for Russia," Trump told reporters. "It's a disgrace that you even asked that question because it's a whole big fat hoax. It's just a hoax." Trump also said he doesn't know anything about what happened to the notes taken by an interpreter when he met with Putin last summer in Finland or after other meetings with the Russian leader.

The Washington Post reported that Trump has taken at least one interpreter's notes after a meeting with Putin and instructed a linguist not to brief anyone else in the administration about what the two leaders had discussed during their closed-door meeting.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: adamschiff; california; defundnpr; defundpbs; democrats; districtofcolumbia; energy; hydrocarbons; jamescomey; lisapage; maga; mediawingofthednc; npr; opec; partisanmediashills; pbs; peterstrzok; philipewing; presstitutes; robertmueller; russia; schiffforbrains; smearmachine; trump; twitter; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Innovative

LOL, sorry for the large red font. Boy, you can tell PBS and NPR are a sore spot with me...


61 posted on 01/14/2019 8:07:49 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog; thesharkboy

>
Last year when the GOP voted to fully fund NPR I came to the conclusion that they were never serious about cutting Federal spending.

I mean, If we can’t defund NPR, what on earth CAN we defund?
>

Oh, that’s easy: NOTHING. (How’d those ~7 prior anti-O’Care bills go again??)

Esp. considering the (R)N(C) has given us the biggest, illegal, unconst. budgets/dept/agencies/edicts *EVERY* time they gain the majority: TSA, NSA, NCLB, MediXYZ expansion, TARP...


62 posted on 01/15/2019 9:22:19 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

That is, of course, the goal of all of this. That said, DJT certainly knows of this plan as well as we do (He’s endured it non-stop for years now!) and he is certainly one who is capable of throwing counter-punches and beating the odds. I’m not saying he will win at it - but this is a guy who had the speaker of the house of his own party calling on him to resign and withdraw from the race who won just weeks later. Don’t count the ol’ boy out just yet...


63 posted on 01/15/2019 5:56:05 PM PST by Dan C (We are what we repeatedly do - excellence therefore is not an act but a habit. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

#3. Right. National Propaganda Radio. or “Novosti Public Radio”.


64 posted on 01/16/2019 2:21:26 AM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Oooooh. "Explosive press reports". It doesn't get more damning than that.
65 posted on 01/16/2019 6:26:40 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Oooooh. "Explosive press reports". It doesn't get more damning than that.

Well it gets worse, these explosive reports were based on not one, but TWO unnamed sources.

66 posted on 01/16/2019 6:29:40 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Pelosi explains the "wrap-up smear".

Reader's Digest version: "You smear somebody. Then you "report" it, giving it validation, and then we say, "See? It's been "reported"....

67 posted on 01/16/2019 6:31:06 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Alice in Wonderland made more sense than Trump derangement syndrome.


68 posted on 01/16/2019 9:21:44 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson