Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ridesthemiles
According to Pareto Distribution (my post #37), it would be technically possible to cut 80%. Although 60% would probably be ideal since 25% of the 80% could probably be retrained for useful assistant work (making copies, filing, etc.) to improve the efficiency of the 20% who do most of the actual work.

In the private sector, as you probably know, shared assistants are popular. The one I use also works with three other supervisor level people. Also, in the private sector, most supervisor level people are also expected to do actual work. In my case, about 3-4 times as much actual work as supervisory duties.

44 posted on 01/14/2019 1:28:01 PM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman; akalinin

Depends on the industry. I’ve always looked upon it as:

20% of your clients will be needy at any given time, while
80% are on autopilot. If those 20% are always the same, time to get rid of them...


48 posted on 01/14/2019 3:05:50 PM PST by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson