It could have been a bomb, but an accidental gas explosion is more likely.
It shows the inexperience of a "citizen journalist" as he calls himself. It is owing to lack of formal journalism training.
Giving him the benefit of the doubt, it was a very emotional and horrific thing for him to have seen.
There was some of the things he said that stuck with me (as close as I can remember them).
- "There is a guy walking in a daze barefoot through broken glass"
- "That woman over there has no clothes one (ripped off her body by the blast). Someone has given her a coat to put around her."
- "There are people covered in a lot of blood."
AND....to his credit, he was very concerned about not invading their privacy at a very horrible moment, like not showing the woman and the injured.
What he got wrong was only his jumping to a conclusion it was terrorist attack I think.
Do you agree with my assessment?
Good points. I was thinking of CNN types and how they hype everything.