Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Especially since there was no demand for the imported goods.

And here is that cognitive dissonance again.

The people with money buy the goods. The demand may have come from Charleston, but the goods were dropped off in New York, and then an American coastal packet delivered them to the people who bought them, while taking a larger than warranted delivery charge.

New York was cleaning up both directions.

Then who took the cotton from Southern ports to Europe? U.S. ships?

I would imagine it was both American ships and Foreign ships, but probably mostly American ships.

542 posted on 01/17/2019 4:22:59 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
New York was cleaning up both directions.

How? Imported goods came into New York but exports left the Southern ports, not New York.

I would imagine it was both American ships and Foreign ships, but probably mostly American ships.

Foreign or U.S., it would make more sense for those ships to arrive at the Southern ports loaded with those imported goods you claim the South demanded rather than arrive empty. The only reason for doing to do so is there wasn't any demand for the imports.

543 posted on 01/17/2019 4:30:15 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson