Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Not at all, but then you didn't accurately describe how it worked. The Foreign ships didn't bother going to Southern ports because there was no advantage to doing so. Coastal packet shipping companies, (owned by pretty much the same people that owned the larger international shipping companies) moved cargo from New York to other ports.

The navigation act of 1817 made it unprofitable for foreign ships to go to Southern ports. That's why getting out of the deal would have been such an economic boon to the Southern port cities. It would have also reduced shipping prices between ports because north eastern owned shipping companies could no longer gouge because they had a monopoly.

536 posted on 01/17/2019 3:51:04 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
The Foreign ships didn't bother going to Southern ports because there was no advantage to doing so.

Especially since there was no demand for the imported goods.

The navigation act of 1817 made it unprofitable for foreign ships to go to Southern ports.

Then who took the cotton from Southern ports to Europe? U.S. ships?

539 posted on 01/17/2019 4:13:14 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson