Posted on 01/07/2019 5:53:37 PM PST by Kaslin
The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission stirred up controversy last week when they erred on the side of common sense and the Second Amendment. The Commission investigating the so-called “Valentine’s Day massacre” that left 14 students and 3 teachers dead, and another 17 people wounded recommended that teachers who were willing to volunteer, undergo background checks, psychological evaluations and training, be allowed to carry concealed firearms on campus.
Opponents of the recommendation argue that armed-teachers wouldn’t stop mass shootings and it’s a bad idea that would make students less safe. They feel teachers should be teaching, not playing Robocop. Some of them have asked the questions, what if a teacher goes crazy and shoots a student? Or, what if the teacher is so inept with a gun that they accidentally shoot anyone who may be in the way? They believe guns are better off left in the hands of trained professionals such as cops and military personnel. But are they right? I don’t think so.
First off, the only things that separate an armed-cop from an armed-teacher is training and permission to carry. There’s nothing a cop can learn about firing a gun that a teacher cannot. Additionally, teachers tend to be patient, caring and protective of their students. It’s no wonder so many have stood in the line of fire in school shootings. You may recall that instead of engaging Nikolas Cruz in a fire fight, it was the Broward County deputies themselves, led by Sheriff Scott Israel, that hid behind their vehicles and school walls while students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High were executed by the killer. Several staffers courageously stood between the shooter and their students. They were the first line of defense for those kids.
Now that you know my arguments, let’s unpack them further.
First, training. Police who are trained in firearms may have an advantage over the average citizen, but not necessarily over an avid gun enthusiast who visits a range frequently. If a policeman freshens up on his skills monthly, but his neighbor goes to the range weekly, who has the advantage over whom? Wearing a uniform and having the authority to carry a firearm doesn’t determine someone’s skill level when it comes to shooting.
Secondly, we all have fond memories of our favorite teacher growing up. I’m sure you can remember that teacher who took the time to give you words of encouragement that made you believe your dreams were possible. They realized your potential even before you did. Remember that teacher who wasn’t afraid to call your parents if it meant they could get better results out of you because they knew you were capable of more? We all can remember those teachers that simply showed they cared. Now, imagine one of those teachers voluntarily undergoing a psychological evaluation and firearms training to protect you from harm in the unlikely event of a mass shooting. Do you think they’d hesitate to take a bullet or fire one to protect your child from a shooter if they had to? I don’t. They have a bond with their students that cops never will.
Lastly, if you add firearms training to a teacher’s natural proclivity to be caring and pragmatic, it’s highly unlikely they’ll snap and go on a shooting rampage themselves. Never mind the ridiculous notion that they’d be so inept with a gun that they’d shoot everyone in site but the bad guy. If teachers were capable of committing mass shootings in schools, we’d be hearing about a growing epidemic of teacher shootings. Think about it. How easy would it be for a teacher to sneak a gun on campus and shoot someone? Extremely easy. Yet, we don’t hear about that happening.
Furthermore, with all due respect to our cops, their suicide rate compared to teachers are off the charts. Yet, we trust them to protect our communities with firearms. According to a 2016 column in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution titled “Teachers have the lowest suicide rate,” a Center for Disease Control and Prevention report revealed that “the suicide rate among people in education, training and library was 7.5 per 100,000 workers. That’s the lowest among all 22 occupations included in the report.” The highest suicide rate, particularly with women, were seen amongst police officers, firefighters and correction officers due to on-the-job stress and isolation from communities.
The bottom line is this, if we want to get serious about protecting our kids from mass shootings while they’re in school we should develop standard school safety requirements across the country. Including, metal detectors where necessary, mental screenings for kids that have shown repeated violent and threatening behavioral patterns, there should be a minimum of one school safety officer on campus trained to engage a mass shooter where possible and diffuse less violent scenarios. And last but far from least, we need to arm teachers that are willing to voluntarily undergo firearms training and psychological examinations.
We trust teachers with our kid’s futures. Why not their lives?
USE TRAINED DOGS! No AH will come in with a gun or bomb, b/c they will be sniffed out and change their mind and underwear as soon as the dog snarled. Only thing scarier is racking a round into a shotgun, IMHO.
Just let the farm boys carry their rifles in their trucks like they did in the years gone by...and open a class on gun safety. That would be enough to make a wannabe shooter think twice.
Require concealed carry of a Glock holster.
Can be used as a purse or Glock, depending on the teacher's inclinations.
That tactic works WELL for a lot of Texas rural schools.
Otoh, MOST of our ISD in Texas have school district police, who are trained at least as well as the city/county officers.
(All peace officers here are STATE officers, who are certified by TCLOSE.)
Fwiw, I’m a Presiding Election Judge & on election days, I can carry concealed at my assigned polling place. - I don’t, as my precincts are on HS campuses that have police officers & those LEOs are always nearby & help us Election Officials to keep the peace.
(My “secret” is that I always bring coffee & have “goodies” available for the EO/LEO & our voters, too.)
Yours, TMN78247
““They believe guns are better off left in the hands of trained professionals such as cops...””
Hopefully, the gal in the pic with her thumb and forefinger up on the slide will be shown the correct method to grip a pistol....
But what about students ganging up to take the weapon from a teacher? Think “inner city kids”.
The students should never know where the pistols are and who has them.
GOOD PLAN.
Yours, TMN78247
Oh, and I'm merely relating what has occurred to policymakers.
My younger son is a federal police officer. His cousin has a company teaching defensive handling of firearms. Both regularly carry concealed pistols more substantial than the .380 you can fit in the palm of a hand. You would never suspect they are armed, because they take seriously the word “concealed”.
I still can't carry at school; and, I don't think they will ever allow it. We do now have six LEOs at school rather than one. They are very large men and each pack two Glocks that can be seen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.