Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Nope, even "T" assumes a discrete set of genders; if it's a spectrum, there's no "trans-".
14 posted on 01/04/2019 8:13:38 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: NobleFree

It admittedly seems a conundrum and a paradox to try to both embrace and reject, say, maleness in one theory. Maybe the string of letters should include an A as Anti-. But the bigger point is that it’s all manner of bending of sex roles. The rise of “gay marriage” has stunned many as to its rationale. Things must have become weak and sick in order to permit it to get a foothold as more than a curiosity. It seems to be a barometer of overall faith in transcendent meaning, or the lack of it.


18 posted on 01/04/2019 11:25:52 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson