To: DugwayDuke
USSC didnt limit its ruling to federal judges.
That's besides the point I was making. The point is that, a federal judge's case is not as high-profile as that of an indictment or impeachment of a president. Impeachment procedures might be the same, but the targets are NOT EQUAL in all cases, and when it comes to the president, it's highly doubtful that the case would be treated the same as with a federal judge or anybody else lower than the president. With the president, THE PEOPLE are involved, and SCOTUS would also be involved. IOW, apples and oranges, as far as the cases involved.
54 posted on
12/27/2018 7:22:17 PM PST by
adorno
To: adorno
adorno wrote: “With the president, THE PEOPLE are involved, and SCOTUS would also be involved. IOW, apples and oranges, as far as the cases involved.”
You can believe whatever you wish but the law is not on your side. USSC has already ruled they have no jurisdiction.
58 posted on
12/28/2018 7:33:26 AM PST by
DugwayDuke
("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson