Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
USSC didn’t limit it’s ruling to federal judges.

That's besides the point I was making. The point is that, a federal judge's case is not as high-profile as that of an indictment or impeachment of a president. Impeachment procedures might be the same, but the targets are NOT EQUAL in all cases, and when it comes to the president, it's highly doubtful that the case would be treated the same as with a federal judge or anybody else lower than the president. With the president, THE PEOPLE are involved, and SCOTUS would also be involved. IOW, apples and oranges, as far as the cases involved.
54 posted on 12/27/2018 7:22:17 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: adorno

adorno wrote: “With the president, THE PEOPLE are involved, and SCOTUS would also be involved. IOW, apples and oranges, as far as the cases involved.”

You can believe whatever you wish but the law is not on your side. USSC has already ruled they have no jurisdiction.


58 posted on 12/28/2018 7:33:26 AM PST by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson