Replies

All the “non-essential” jobs then would be deemed “essential” by the Dems, who shortly would find themselves without the kinds of constituencies they labored so long and hard to build. Anyone ultimately cutting out the “non-essential” jobs would be considered to be an enemy of all those people “who just want to feed their families” and would throw them out into the job market with all the “non-skills” they’ve acquired with their “non-essential” jobs. It’s the perfect “no-win” situation for Trump.

It’s the perfect “no-win” situation for Trump.

So, you are for the big-government, non-essential programs and jobs, just because it would be no good for Trump? How about it not being good for the people, and not being good for the budget, and not being good for the hard-working people who have to pony up for the non-essential waste?

The only way to get rid of waste and non-essential government programs, is to just do it and not worry about the politics. Remember that there are likely a lot more people interested on getting rid of waste than those that just want the political issue.

Trump will be gone in 6 years, and the non-essential and wasteful government programs will just be growing, with more to come, if nothing is done about it.