This article is ridiculous. The Supreme Court did not rule on these issues - but it is written as though they did. This was a decision on whether or not to bypass the normal appellate process - they decided not to do it. Otherwise, 4 votes would have been enough for the Court to hear the case on an appeal.
This article is fake news - yet look at how many people commenting fell for it - if it had that effect here, then think of the effect among the less politically savvy that are reading it.
Thank you for clarifying the issue. I must reread the whole article.