Question for any lawyers here (even sea lawyers):
Given the fact that the dossier was financed as political opposition research, and that nearly none of the allegations within were vetted, let alone verified, how is it that the FISA warrant is still valid? Further, how is Mueller’s investigation still legal?
Why is this not being asked in the media? How about Congress?
The media has to read Democrat Talking Points. The media is not going to change.
Buried in the details of FISA is the specific notation that info used to obtain FISA warrants need not meet the standard of reasonable suspicion that normal American justice system warrants must meet, and the normal standards aren’t that high to start with.
If suspicion of illegal conduct was reasonable, the warrants needed would be issued by normal courts and investigated normally by US attorneys and the FBI. There would be no need to invoke FISA.
FISA is sloppy legislation and Chief Justice Roberts has been derelict in supervision of FISA courts, even if he isn’t an outright conspirator.
Why is this not being asked in the media? How about Congress?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Because the media is out to get Trump
And Congress wants to get rid of Trump so they can all go back to the uniparty days.