Agreed.
Tactically, Ann is simply the female author version of Trump. Rough and tumble, tell it like it is. She only said exactly what he would have said roles reversed.
Ann is great. Articulate, witty and full of facts. NOBODY in America is more dedicated to the cause which got Trump elected: sane immigration policy, including the promised WALL.
She is not begging for a job in the admin like Clarke (who I like). She is Trumpishly badgering the one and only guy right now in a position to immediately give significant aid to the issue of our generation.
It's OK for folks to like and admire Trump. But he is nowhere near perfect. And no man is more important than the issue.
It is unfortunate that some like Trump so much that they end up hating the most Trump-like vocal supporter of the cause that got him elected. Trump is at least as severe in criticism of other Republicans, often the good ones too, as Ann is of him. Regardless his quite predictable Twitter reflex... he can take it.
And he did take it. Trump is a great politician and effective populist in the sense that he sees, significantly clearer than most, how to read the instrumentation of societal navigation within current political atmospheres. And Ann is the border security barometer.
He read her. It helped. He was slipping.
Ann wears well the evidence of message-over-messenger dedication: ALL the Left plus the messenger-over-message Right hate her.
No..she’s NOTHING at all like Trump and add to that, nobody, least of all her, knew what he was thinking, nor what he was going to do or not do.
Well said.