Or that Flynn wants to be damaged so he will have standing in a future countersuit on civil rights violations, maybe?
Or that Flynn wants to be damaged so he will have standing in a future suit on civil rights violations, maybe?
Flynn ratified his plea which could be used as a defense if he pursues a civil case. But IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer), and am aware of a recent case where appellate judges state that illegal acts are not wrongful (no dissent). So when courts change the meaning of words on you, anything can happen.