It wasn’t snark. It was sarcasm, irony and pathos for the state of the law.
> It wasnt snark. It was sarcasm... <
LOL. I just reread your original post. Yes, I can see it now (really). And I should have seen it originally, because I’m a fan of that approach.
Subtle sarcasm can be quite effective. But sometimes it goes over the head of someone who’s not expecting it (like me in this case).
Regards,
LR