Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

It wasn’t snark. It was sarcasm, irony and pathos for the state of the law.


247 posted on 12/19/2018 9:22:29 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

> It wasn’t snark. It was sarcasm... <

LOL. I just reread your original post. Yes, I can see it now (really). And I should have seen it originally, because I’m a fan of that approach.

Subtle sarcasm can be quite effective. But sometimes it goes over the head of someone who’s not expecting it (like me in this case).

Regards,
LR


248 posted on 12/19/2018 9:38:26 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson