Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: suthener
And I’m pretty sure I have not mentioned in one post about bump stocks. I am only defending the statement I made, that automatic weapons are not banned. You agree with me, yet feel a need to bring up unrelated subjects. That confuses me very much.

Bump stocks are the subject of the OP. It's hardly off-topic for this thread.

178 posted on 12/18/2018 2:08:02 PM PST by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: Simon Green

“Bump stocks are the subject of the OP. It’s hardly off-topic for this thread.”

I haven’t mentioned them. But it’s kind of ironic that I had a debate the other day with a FReeper about bump stocks. I’m not sure where you stand, and I really don’t want to start another debate, but I was arguing that there is no law supporting the ban on bump stocks. The person I was arguing with, when I stated the law, would copy and paste a portion of a news article about the Las Vegas shootings. They wouldn’t argue the law, just try to change the subject or throw up a straw man argument. Seems like a trend around here. I said earlier, and I meant it, if someone proves me wrong, I will admit it and apologize. Most people don’t seem to want to do that.


180 posted on 12/18/2018 2:18:17 PM PST by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson