Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgetown renegotiating solar, wind power contracts (Texas Renewable Energy FAIL)
Austin American Statesman ^ | 16 December 2018 | Claire Osborne

Posted on 12/17/2018 8:34:26 AM PST by TADSLOS

GEORGETOWN — The city of Georgetown’s bill for wind and solar energy ended up being $8.6 million more than anticipated in fiscal year 2018 because the falling prices of oil and gas meant it had to sell its surplus renewable power for less than forecast, said City Manager David Morgan.

The city had budgeted $45 million for renewable energy but ended up paying $53.6 million, he said.

Georgetown was able to reduce the $8.6 million unanticipated extra to $6.8 million through savings from lower capital improvement utility project costs, Morgan said. It paid the remaining $6.8 million with reserves from the city’s energy fund, he said.

The City Council also approved a budget amendment Dec. 12 that will build the reserves in the electric fund, which helped to pay for some of the loss, from $1.9 million back up to $4 million in 2019.

Georgetown is in the middle of renegotiating its 20- to 25-year wind and solar contracts to try to get a better deal, Morgan said.

But at least one resident and a conservative think tank said the city should not have made the contracts for so long and shouldn’t be relying on green sources of energy.

Georgetown began getting 100 percent of its power through renewable energy in April 2017. The city has received international attention for its commitment to solar and wind power.

Morgan said that when the city signed wind and solar contracts around 2012, it was looking at long-term demands and contracted for more energy than it needed to grow into it as the city of Georgetown grew. The city contracted for 20 years with a wind farm west of Amarillo and for 25 years with a solar power farm outside of Fort Stockton, he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: governmentwaste; leftistfail; renewableenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Texas Wind and Solar FAIL.
1 posted on 12/17/2018 8:34:27 AM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Every financial decision is a bet (or a payoff). Welcome to the real world, Georgetown. Have you figured out who benefited from this decision?


2 posted on 12/17/2018 8:43:45 AM PST by Pecos (Better the one you have with you than the one you left at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Georgetown is in the middle of renegotiating its 20- to 25-year wind and solar contracts to try to get a better deal, Morgan said.

Ha....good luck wid dat

Sun stops making sunspots and a new ice age starts up

Solar panels frozen over and windmills frozen solid.

3 posted on 12/17/2018 8:44:31 AM PST by spokeshave (recovering Spokeshave from another computer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

They saved money but not as much as expected because of electricity price fluctuations. DISASTER!


4 posted on 12/17/2018 8:44:42 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos
Have you figured out who benefited from this decision?

It sure as hell isnt the residents here.

5 posted on 12/17/2018 8:46:11 AM PST by TADSLOS (My favorite essential oil is bacon grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Just out of curiosity, how much did they pay for / use conventional power during that timeframe?


6 posted on 12/17/2018 8:50:49 AM PST by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Wait....how can it “cost more” because they had less excess power to sell back?? Are they trying to paint (or so stupid) that less income is reported as higher cost?

Or are they paying more for renewables than generic power, and the reduced income offset less of the premium than forecast? If the second thing, then what business do they have paying a premium for PC power with other people’s money????


7 posted on 12/17/2018 8:53:15 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

More liberal nonsense.


8 posted on 12/17/2018 8:53:42 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know. how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
They buy more power than they need for the current population, to allow for growth, it's a very fast growing town (I live here).

But the idiots I guess aren't aware of the cyclical nature of energy costs here, or that we have massive growth in oil and gas production. So they have to sell the surplus at a loss because of the drop in overall energy prices.

9 posted on 12/17/2018 8:59:49 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

At the end of the day, the sh*t just don’t work. Period!!!!

It might be okay if you’re off the grid in Alaska, or someplace esle, and all your doing is charging up some, deep cycle marine batteries for some lights and tools. But, on a grand scale it doesn’t worth it at all.

And toss in the issues with solar panels and it all seems like one giant liberal scam that is, as usual, taking the taxpayer for a ride. Liberals, unless they’re the uber rich like Gates and Steyer, make all their money off the government and taxpayer. Hell, even Gates cashes in on the taxpayer as all software programs that every government entity, from the local level to the feds, uses microsoft office. Gates was a big proponent of Common Core and guess who was making the software for that debacle.

And now the issues with solar panels is coming to light, in addition to the fact that it isn’t all the reliable, either. Not sure what political slant this site has, but they detail some interesting information about the negatives of solar.

http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/6/21/are-we-headed-for-a-solar-waste-crisis


10 posted on 12/17/2018 9:00:23 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
More liberal nonsense.

From a so called republican mayor.

11 posted on 12/17/2018 9:01:36 AM PST by TADSLOS (My favorite essential oil is bacon grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

We need a Constitutional Amendment that prevents bureaucrats from negotiating contracts longer than 6 months. Brutal how lousy they are at it. Pension liabilities to Democrats will bring the country to its knees.


12 posted on 12/17/2018 9:03:22 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

HAIL STORMS wipe out solar panels...by the hundreds...Replacement will take 3 year plus....No landfill will accept the broken panels.....People wihtout power are angry.....


13 posted on 12/17/2018 9:04:56 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I live here too. This boils down to a bunch of liberal feel good crap at the expense of consumers. Our (R) mayor is an Al Gore fanboi and a Trump basher.


14 posted on 12/17/2018 9:05:37 AM PST by TADSLOS (My favorite essential oil is bacon grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

So the utility is municipal, and they’re locking in a contract wholesale price in exchange for guaranteeing the purchase of a certain amount of energy over the following year? Then the spot price falls and they get caught with their pants down if they bought too much?


15 posted on 12/17/2018 9:09:32 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yep. Not just one year. 20 to 25 years. Nutz.


16 posted on 12/17/2018 9:12:20 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Holy crap. Is there any further evidence needed that municipalities don’t need to be in the utility business?


17 posted on 12/17/2018 9:20:18 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

I’m curious about something.

It says that the wind farm is west of Amarillo. Driving, that’s almost 500 miles from Georgetown. I’m not sure how far as the crow flies.

I don’t know much about electricity. I wonder, though, isn’t some of the power “lost” in transmission? It would seem to me that it would make more sense to utilize the electricity generated closer to the source.

I’m sure that the infrastructure costs would be less.


18 posted on 12/17/2018 9:21:03 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

I’ve wondered why more effort hasn’t been put into making wind and solar technologies more affordable for the individual homeowner. I think you’ve answered that; that’s not where the big money is.

I’ve looked into both solar and wind power for household use but something that takes 25 years to pay for itself isn’t something I’m interested in.


19 posted on 12/17/2018 9:27:04 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: susannah59

Especially when the life of solar panels is half that.


20 posted on 12/17/2018 9:37:55 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson