#20. Let’s go with both positions, i.e. Doyle Moynihan wanting a share of the financial penalty/finders fees, and Meadows wanting to act on their docs now.
Question: Did D/M deliver these documents (3 times?) to Special Prosecutor Huber directly, or to his staff (would be nice to have them identified and questioned under oath as to whether they (or associates) got these docs, and if so, did they lose them (according to D/M?.
What’s with the “lost them story” of D/M? Needs to be aired out thoroughly. Could lead to other issues such as chain of custody, failure to notify the boss what they had received, etc.
Re Meadows: Yes, he wants action ASAP and time is running out before the biggest coverup in recent Congressional history (along side of Clinton Foundationgate, UraniumOne, Clinton Servergate, Dossiergate, BenghaziGate, IRSGate, Iran’s $150Billiongate, and the Clintons/DSCC MafiaMoneyGate (The American Spectator, April 1997, Byron York, “Let’s Be Friends: A Mob-Controlled Union Delivers the Goods for Bill”).
Damned. The Democrats are so good at “closing gates” you’d think they were the Nigh Watchman. None dare call it treason.
Meadows: Subpoena the D/M documents NOW and allow them to present them in closed session (before Congress’ session runs out and so will the subpoena’s power.)
In the alternative, the new Senate Judiciary Committee can subpoena D/M for next year’s session, first day. Let the fireworks begin and keep the pressure on.
Either Huber is going to let us know that he is doing something, or should quit as ineffective. I’m hoping the guy (who I know nothing about), is an honest leader and a competent one. They are in very short demand right now and I’m placing them on the Endangered Species List.