Replies

SCOTUS ruled the police have no duty to protect any one individual. They have a duty to keep the peace and protect the public. For an attorney to claim that an armed school security guard has no duty to confront a school shooter, to try and stop mass slaughter, is absurd. For starters, why are we paying these people? Funding pensions? Can save a crapton of money. Notice it's always and ever "Heads We Win, Tails You Lose." School isn't optional, it is mandatory. Parents have to send their kids there. And yet, many school systems reject the principle of in loco parentis that is, the school acts as the child's parents in their absence. This isn't a matter of opinion. The schools are liable and responsible for what happens to the kids in their charge.

For starters, why are we paying these people?

Because if we don't hand over our money, the government will send these 'brave' individuals to our homes to arrest/kill us.