Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harvard Study Confirms the Gender Wage Gap is Just a Myth
https://legalinsurrection.com ^ | December 11, 2018 | by Mary Chastain

Posted on 12/12/2018 12:31:49 PM PST by Para-Ord.45

Not that it matters to the left, but a study from Harvard University titled Why Do Women Earn Less Than Men? proves the gender wage gap is indeed a myth because of the obvious reasons: work choices between men and women.

Why do men make more than women? Their choice of jobs and working a lot of overtime.

In order to prove their point, authors Valentin Bolotnyy and Natalia Emanuel looked at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). It is unionized, which means men and women are treated the same and have to follow the same rules and receive the same benefits. So why do the men earn more?

From the study’s abstract (emphasis mine):

Even in a unionized environment where work tasks are similar, hourly wages are identical, and tenure dictates promotions, female workers earn $0.89 on the male-worker dollar (weekly earnings). We use confidential administrative data on bus and train operators from the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to show that the weekly earnings gap can be explained by the workplace choices that women and men make. Women value time away from work and flexibility more than men, taking more unpaid time off using the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and working fewer overtime hours than men. When overtime hours are scheduled three months in advance, men and women work a similar number of hours; but when those hours are offered at the last minute, men work nearly twice as many. When selecting work schedules, women try to avoid weekend, holiday, and split shifts more than men. To avoid unfavorable work times, women prioritize their schedules over route safety and select routes with a higher probability of accidents. Women are less likely than men to game the scheduling system by trading off work hours at regular wages for overtime hours at premium wages. These results suggest that some policies that increase workplace flexibility, like shift swapping and expanded cover lists, can reduce the gender earnings gap and disproportionately increase the well-being of female workers.

Overtime pays time-and-a-half. The authors found that men train and bus drivers accepted overtime more than their women counterparts by 83%. These males twice as likely took overtime than the females. Men accepted scheduled overtime scheduled three months in advance 7% more than the women.

As women moved up the food chain and had the opportunity to prioritize their schedules, the majority of them “moved away from working weekends, holidays, and split shifts more than men.”

Bolotnyy and Emanuel wrote that the evidence they discovered “so far on the earnings gap in our setting suggests that insufficient flexibility and high female values of time outside the workplace are its root causes.”

John Phelan, an economist at the Center of the American Experiment, provided an excellent analysis of the study. The gender wage gap came to light due to a dumb methodology that ignores basic observations (emphasis mine):

It ignores the fact that according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), in 2017, men worked an average of 8.05 hours in an average day compared to 7.24 hours for women.

True, women are more likely to be raising children, taking care of elderly family members, or doing housework, leaving them with fewer hours in the day for paid employment. But this does not alter the essential fact: that people working fewer hours, on average, can be expected to earn lower incomes, on average.

Let me repeat: When you work fewer hours, you will make less than what others make who work more hours.

This led Phelan to conclude that this “‘gender wage gap’ is as real as unicorns and has been killed more times than Michael Myers.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: genderinequality; inequality; sexism; wagegap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Para-Ord.45

Here is the problem.

Femies think they should be able to drop out of the workforce for a couple of years thennplug back in as if they never left.


21 posted on 12/12/2018 1:11:36 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Ruth Bader Ginsburg doctor is a taxidermist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“Supply and demand” is an economic natural law. Gov’t can interfere however it likes, but the same outcome prevails one way or another: if you work hard/smarter/longer/better, you accumulate more wealth. Inequality is as unstoppable as gravity.


22 posted on 12/12/2018 1:15:22 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Yeah, I’m trying to deal with one now: worked 3 of the last 12 years, but thinks she should be paid commensurate with 12 years’ experience. She’d have a breakdown if I said “you’ve worked 3 years, expect to be paid accordingly.”


23 posted on 12/12/2018 1:18:22 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
They don’t care about facts. At the end of the day they want to have the same W2 as a man who did not demand all that flexibility. And, the way things are headed, they’ll eventually get it.

Women are the majority of voters in the U.S.A.

Women control most of the wealth in the U.S.A.

Women make most of the spending decisions in the U.S.A.

I am not surprised they are shaping the country to grant them political and practical privilege more than men.

All the while while claiming to be suppressed.

24 posted on 12/12/2018 1:22:19 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

” they’ll eventually get it.”

Yep. ‘To each each - according to their need’. IOW - it will become a competition of who is the greater victim.

Ayn Rand painted the picture perfectly when describing the demise of the ‘20th Century Motor Factory’.


25 posted on 12/12/2018 1:42:29 PM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

As a woman who has been in the workforce for over 30 years, I am not surprised. I am fine with women chosing more flexibilty, but there is a cost.


26 posted on 12/12/2018 1:49:11 PM PST by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vaskypilot

“I am fine with women chosing more flexibilty, but there is a cost.”

That reminds me of the old joke about the difference between economics and sociology: Economics is about the choices that individuals make. Sociology is about why individuals don’t have any choices to make.


27 posted on 12/12/2018 1:57:04 PM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Men barely work 8 hours a day, on average? I get why women would work a bit less than 8, but it sounds like for every guy we have working 10 hours we have another one working only 6???


28 posted on 12/12/2018 2:01:28 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

bkmk


29 posted on 12/12/2018 2:21:23 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Doesn’t matter WHY pay is different - women have to get as much as men. Even if they stay home all day.


30 posted on 12/12/2018 3:12:59 PM PST by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Just what we all need-—a brain surgeon who gets paid the same as the rural Montana school janitor.


31 posted on 12/13/2018 6:12:47 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vaskypilot

I have worked for over 61 years. Still have one bookkeeping client-—for over 48 years.

I went out on my own- self employed- in 1980. I could set my own time schedule & drop clients I thought might be sketchy.

I didn’t have to deal with the internal bitchiness of other women. One client just retired- he is younger than I, and I did his company bookkeeping for over 45 years.


32 posted on 12/13/2018 6:18:42 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I have seen at least one study that says that in truth the average woman makes MORE per hour of work than the average man if you look at men and women who do the same kind of work.


33 posted on 12/14/2018 10:04:53 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

I believe it, at least in certain positions that are hard to find women (or “minorities” however defined) for.

Housekeeper wages are low for all.


34 posted on 12/14/2018 10:27:15 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson